Skip to main content

AI Portfolio Insights

Analysis of your $47,823.56 across 8 holdings · last run 14 minutes ago

Rebalance

Portfolio Health

Weighted across six factors

Solid returns, but concentration and correlation are holding the score back. Addressing BTC overweight would lift this to roughly 78.

Score band

68 of 100
Poor Fair Good Excellent

Fair band spans 60–74. Reaching Good requires 75.

Trend

30 days ago
64
Today
68
If rebalanced
91
Score
68 / 100 · Fair
Percentile
Top 34% of users
Change (30d)
+4 points

Score Breakdown

What is helping and what is not

Returns 88

+25.2% all-time, comfortably ahead of a BTC-only benchmark.

Risk-adjusted 76

Sharpe of 1.42 — returns are not coming purely from risk-taking.

Cost efficiency 82

0.145% effective fee rate, helped by a 68% maker ratio.

Diversification 54

Eight holdings, but 0.61 average correlation between them.

Concentration 42

BTC at 42% against a 35% target — the largest drag on the score.

Rebalance discipline 61

Last rebalanced 94 days ago; drift has reached 6.4%.

Versus similar portfolios

Your score 68
Peer median 61
Top quartile 82

Compared against 4,280 portfolios of similar size and asset count.

Strongest factor
Returns · 88
Weakest factor
Concentration · 42
Weighted total
68 / 100

Recommendations

Ranked by impact on your health score

High +9 pts

Reduce Bitcoin concentration

BTC is 42% of the portfolio against your 35% target. Trimming 0.0496 BTC brings it back in line and frees roughly $3,347 to redeploy.

Sell 0.0496 BTC ≈ $3,347
Review
High +6 pts

Exit the XRP position

Down 12.5% with deteriorating structure, and it is your only holding the models rate as Sell. Closing also harvests a $547 loss against realised gains.

Sell 6,220 XRP ≈ $3,819
Review
Medium +4 pts

Add an uncorrelated asset

Your holdings average 0.61 correlation. Adding exposure outside the L1 cluster would improve genuine diversification rather than just position count.

Increase LINK weight to 6%
Explore
Medium +3 pts

Set a rebalance schedule

You last rebalanced 94 days ago and drift has reached 6.4%. A quarterly cadence keeps allocation close to target without over-trading.

Quarterly rebalance 4× / year
Configure
Low +1 pt

Consolidate dust positions

ATOM and AVAX together account for 2% of the portfolio. Small positions add tracking overhead without meaningfully affecting returns.

2 small positions ≈ $971
Review
Projection All actions

If you act on everything

Acting on all five recommendations lifts your health score from 68 to an estimated 91, mostly by resolving the concentration and correlation drags.

Projected score 68 → 91
Apply all

Current vs Optimised

Allocation the models would prefer

Current Optimised

Expected effect

Volatility

−18%

Correlation

0.61 → 0.48

Expected return

Unchanged

Health score

68 → 91

Largest change
BTC −9pp
Trades required
5
Est. turnover
$8,140 · 17% of portfolio

Risk vs Return

Where your portfolio sits

Your portfolio sits below the frontier: the same 25.2% return is reachable at roughly 18% less volatility by rebalancing toward the optimised weights.

Your volatility
3.14%
Optimised volatility
2.58%
Efficiency gap
18%